Cardiac
Glycosides
The English botanist, chemist, and physician Sir William
Withering is credited with the first published observation in 1785 that digitalis
purpurea, a derivative of the purple foxglove flower, could be used for the
treatment of "cardiac dropsy," or congestive heart failure. The
benefits of cardiac glycosides in CHF have been extensively studied (Eichhorn
and Gheorghiade, 2002) and are generally attributed to:
- Inhibition of the plasma membrane Na+, K+-ATPase in myocytes
- A positive inotropic effect on the failing myocardium
- Suppression of rapid ventricular rate response in CHF-associated atrial fibrillation
- Regulation of downstream deleterious effects of sympathetic nervous system overactivation
With each cardiac myocyte depolarization, Na+
and Ca2+ ions shift into the intracellular space (Figure 28–5). Ca2+
that enters the cell via the L-type Ca2+ channel during
depolarization triggers the release of stored intracellular Ca2+
from the sarcoplasmic reticulum via the ryanodine receptor (RyR). This Ca2+-induced
Ca2+ release increases the level of cytosolic Ca2+
available for interaction with myocyte contractile proteins, ultimately
increasing myocardial contraction force. During myocyte repolarization and
relaxation, cellular Ca2+ is re-sequestered by the sarcoplasmic
reticular Ca2+-ATPase and is removed from the cell by the Na+Ca2+
exchanger and, to a much lesser extent, by the sarcolemmal Ca2+-ATPase
Cardiac glycosides bind and
inhibit the phosphorylated ( subunit of the sarcolemmal Na+,K+-ATPase
and thereby decreasing Na+ extrusion and increasing cytosolic [Na+].
This decreases the transmembrane Na+ gradient that drives Na+–Ca2+
exchange during myocyte repolarization. As a consequence, less Ca2+
is removed from the cell and more Ca2+ is accumulated in the
sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) by SERCA2. This increase in releasable Ca2+
(from the SR) is the mechanism by which cardiac glycosides enhance myocardial
contractility. Elevated extracellular K+ levels (i.e., hyperkalemia)
cause dephosphorylation of the ATPase subunit, altering the site of action of the
most commonly used cardiac glycoside, digoxin, and thereby reducing the
drug's binding and effect.
Electrophysiologic Actions
At therapeutic serum or plasma concentrations (i.e., 1-2 ng/mL),
digoxin decreases automaticity and increases the maximal diastolic resting
membrane potential in atrial and atrioventricular (AV) nodal tissues. This
occurs via increases in vagal tone and sympathetic nervous system activity
inhibition. In addition, digoxin prolongs the effective refractory period and
decreases conduction velocity in AV nodal tissue. Collectively, these may
contribute to sinus bradycardia, sinus arrest, prolongation of AV conduction,
or high-grade AV block. At higher concentrations, cardiac glycosides may
increase sympathetic nervous system activity that influences cardiac tissue
automaticity, change associated with the genesis of atrial and ventricular
arrhythmias. Increased intracellular Ca2+ loading and sympathetic
tone increases the spontaneous (phase 4) rate of diastolic depolarization as
well as promoting delayed afterdepolarization; together, these decrease the
threshold for generation of a propagated action potential and predisposes to
malignant ventricular arrhythmias (see Chapter 29).
Pharmacokinetics
The
elimination t1/2 for digoxin is 36-48 hours in patients with normal
or near-normal renal function, permitting once-daily dosing. Near steady-state
blood levels are achieved ~7 days after initiation of maintenance therapy.
Digoxin is excreted by the kidney, and increases in cardiac output or renal
blood flow from vasodilator therapy or sympathomimetic agents may increase
renal digoxin clearance, necessitating adjustment of daily maintenance doses. The
volume of distribution and drug clearance rate are both decreased in elderly
patients.
Despite renal clearance, digoxin is not removed effectively by
hemodialysis due to the drug's large (4-7 L/kg) volume of distribution. The
principal tissue reservoir is skeletal muscle and not adipose tissue, and thus
dosing should be based on estimated lean body mass. Most digoxin tablets
average 70-80% oral bioavailability; however, ~10% of the general population
harbors the enteric bacterium Eubacterium lentum, which inactivates
digoxin and thus may account for drug tolerance that is observed in some
patients. Liquid-filled capsules of digoxin (LANOXICAPS) have a higher
bioavailability than do tablets (LANOXIN); thus, the drug requires dosage
adjustment if a patient is switched from one delivery form to the other.
Digoxin is available for intravenous administration, and maintenance doses can
be given intravenously when oral dosing is inappropriate. Digoxin administered
intramuscularly is erratically absorbed, causes local discomfort, and usually
is unnecessary. A number of clinical conditions may alter the pharmacokinetics
of digoxin or patient susceptibility to the toxic manifestations of this drug.
For example, chronic renal failure decreases the volume of distribution of
digoxin and therefore requires a decrease in maintenance dosage of the drug. In
addition, drug interactions that may influence circulating serum digoxin levels
include several commonly used cardiovascular medications such as verapamil,
amiodarone, propafenone, and spironolactone. The rapid administration of Ca2+
increases the risk of inducing malignant arrhythmias in patients already
treated with digoxin. Electrolyte disturbances, especially hypokalemia,
acid–base imbalances, and one's form of underlying heart disease also may alter
a patient's susceptibility to digoxin side effects.
Maximal increase in LV contractility becomes apparent at serum digoxin
levels ~1.4 ng/mL (1.8 nmol) (Kelly and Smith, 1992). The neurohormonal
benefits of digoxin, however, may occur between 0.5-1 ng/mL. In turn, higher
serum concentrations are not associated with incrementally increased clinical
benefit. Moreover, there are data to suggest that the risk of death is greater
with increasing serum concentrations, even at values within the traditional
therapeutic range, and therefore many advocate maintaining digoxin levels <1
ng/mL.
Clinical Use of Digoxin in
Heart Failure
Data
from contemporary clinical trials have re-characterized the utility of cardiac
glycosides, once first-line agents, in CHF, especially in patients with normal
sinus rhythm (as opposed to atrial fibrillation).
Digoxin discontinuation in clinically stable patients with
mild-to-moderate CHF from LV systolic dysfunction worsened symptoms and
decreased maximal treadmill exercise (Uretsky et al., 1993; Packer et al.,
1993). However, eventhough digoxin may decrease CHF-associated hospitalizations
in patients with severe forms of the disease, drug use does not reduce
all-cause mortality. Overall, digoxin use usually is limited to CHF patients
with LV systolic dysfunction in atrial fibrillation or to patients in sinus
rhythm who remain symptomatic despite maximal therapy with ACE inhibitors and adrenergic receptor antagonists. The latter
agents are viewed as first-line therapies because of their proven mortality
benefit.
The
incidence and severity of digoxin toxicity have declined substantially in the
past 2 decades as a consequence of alternative drugs available for the
treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias in CHF, increased understanding of
digoxin pharmacokinetics, improved serum digoxin level monitoring, and
identification of important interactions between digoxin and other commonly
co-administered drugs. Nevertheless, the recognition of digoxin toxicity
remains an important consideration in the differential diagnosis of
arrhythmias, and neurologic or gastrointestinal symptoms in patients receiving
cardiac glycosides. An antidote, digoxin immune Fab (DIGIBIND, DIGIFAB), is
available to treat toxicity.
Among the more common electrophysiologic manifestations of digoxin
toxicity are ectopic beats originating from the AV junction or ventricle,
first-degree AV block, abnormally slow ventricular rate response to atrial
fibrillation, or an accelerated AV junctional pacemaker. When present, only
dosage adjustment and appropriate monitoring are usually necessary. Sinus
bradycardia, sinoatrial arrest or exit block, and second- or third-degree AV
conduction delay requiring atropine or temporary ventricular pacing are
uncommon. Unless in the setting of high-degree AV block, potassium
administration should be considered for patients with evidence of increased AV
junctional or ventricular automaticity even if serum K+ levels are
in the normal range. Lidocaine or phenytoin, which have minimal effects on AV
conduction, may be used for the treatment of digoxin-induced ventricular
arrhythmias that threaten hemodynamic compromise (see Chapter 29). Electrical
cardioversion carries an increased risk of inducing severe rhythm disturbances
in patients with overt digitalis toxicity and should be used with particular
caution. Note, too, that inhibition of the Na+,K+-ATPase
activity of skeletal muscle can cause hyperkalemia. An effective antidote for
life-threatening digoxin (or digitoxin) toxicity is available in the form of
anti-digoxin immunotherapy. Purified Fab fragments from ovine anti-digoxin
antisera (DIGIBIND) are usually dosed by the estimated total dose of digoxin
ingested in order to achieve a fully neutralizing effect. For a more
comprehensive review of the treatment of digitalis toxicity, see Kelly and
Smith (1992).
In the
setting of severely decompensated CHF from reduced cardiac output, the
principal focus of initial therapy is to increase myocardial contractility.
Dopamine and dobutamine are positive inotropic agents most often used to
accomplish this. These drugs provide short-term circulatory support in advanced
CHF via stimulation of cardiac myocyte dopamine (D1) and adrenergic receptors that stimulate the Gs-adenylyl
cyclase-cyclic AMP–PKA pathway. The catalytic subunit of PKA phosphorylates a
number of substrates that enhance Ca+2-dependent myocardial
contraction and accelerate relaxation (Figure 28–5). Isoproterenol, epinephrine,
and norepinephrine are useful in certain circumstances but have little role in
routine CHF management. Indeed, inotropic agents that elevate cardiac cell
cyclic AMP are consistently associated with increased risks of hospitalization
and death, particularly in patients with NYHA class IV. At the cellular level,
enhanced cyclic AMP levels have been associated with apoptosis (Brunton, 2005;
Yan et al., 2007). The basic pharmacology of adrenergic agonists is discussed
in Chapter 12.
Dopamine
is an endogenous catecholamine with only limited utility in the treatment of
most patients with cardiogenic circulatory failure. The pharmacologic and
hemodynamic effects of dopamine are concentration dependent. Low doses (2 g/kg lean body mass/min) induces cyclic
AMP–dependent vascular smooth muscle vasodilation. In addition, activation of D2
receptors on sympathetic nerves in the peripheral circulation at these
concentrations also inhibits NE release and reduces adrenergic stimulation of vascular smooth
muscle, particularly in splanchnic and renal arterial beds. Therefore, low-dose
dopamine infusion often is used to increase renal blood flow and thereby
maintain an adequate glomerular filtration rate in hospitalized CHF patients
with impaired renal function refractory to diuretics. Dopamine also exhibits a
pro-diuretic effect directly on renal tubular epithelial cells that contributes
to volume reduction.
At intermediate
infusion rates (2-5 g/kg/min), dopamine directly stimulates
cardiac receptors and vascular sympathetic neurons
that enhance myocardial contractility and neural NE release. At higher
infusion rates (5-15 g/kg/min), adrenergic receptor stimulation–mediated
peripheral arterial and venous constriction occurs. This may be desirable in
patients with critically reduced arterial pressure or in those with circulatory
failure from severe vasodilation (e.g., sepsis, anaphylaxis). However,
high-dose dopamine infusion has little role in the treatment of patients with
primary cardiac contractile dysfunction; in this setting, increased
vasoconstriction will lead to increased afterload and worsening of LV
performance. Tachycardia, which is more pronounced with dopamine than with
dobutamine, may actually provoke ischemia (and ischemia-induced malignant
arrhythmias) in patients with coronary artery disease.
Dobutamine
is the agonist of choice for the management of CHF
patients with systolic dysfunction. In the formulation available for clinical
use, dobutamine is a racemic mixture that stimulates both 1 and 2 receptor subtypes. In addition,
the (–) enantiomer is an agonist for adrenergic receptors, whereas the (+)
enantiomer is a weak, partial agonist. At infusion rates that result in a
positive inotropic effect in humans, the 1 adrenergic effect in the
myocardium predominates. In the vasculature, the adrenergic agonist effect of the (–)
enantiomer appears to be offset by the (+) enantiomer and vasodilating effects
of 2 receptor stimulation. Thus, the
principal hemodynamic effect of dobutamine is an increase in stroke volume from
positive inotropy, although 2 receptor activation may cause a
decrease in systemic vascular resistance and, therefore, mean arterial
pressure. Despite increases in cardiac output, there is relatively little
chronotropic effect.
Continuous
dobutamine infusions are typically initiated at 2-3 g/kg/min without a loading dose and
uptitrated until the desired hemodynamic response is achieved. Pharmacologic
tolerance may limit infusion efficacy beyond 4 days, and, therefore, addition
or substitution with a class III PDE inhibitor may be necessary to maintain
adequate circulatory support. The major side effects of dobutamine are
tachycardia and supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias, which may require
a reduction in dosage. Recent receptor antagonist use is a common cause of
blunted clinical responsiveness to dobutamine.
The
cyclic AMP–PDE inhibitors decrease cellular cyclic AMP degradation, resulting
in elevated levels of cyclic AMP in cardiac and smooth muscle myocytes. The
physiologic effects of this are positive myocardial inotropism and dilation of
resistance and capacitance vessels. Collectively, therefore, PDE inhibition
improves cardiac output through ionotropy and by decreasing preload and
afterload (thus giving rise to the term inodilator). The clinical
application of early-generation PDE inhibitors (e.g., theophylline, caffeine)
is limited by low cardiovascular specificity and an unfavorable side-effect
profile, whereas inamrinone, milrinone, and other more recently developed PDE
inhibitors are preferred
No comments:
Post a Comment